In Israel, the healthcare system is often praised for its efficiency and high level of digitalization. Nearly 95% of physical health records are stored digitally, giving doctors access to a patient's medical history with just a few clicks. However, when it comes to mental health care, things are much more fragmented. Primary care physicians, who often serve as the first point of contact for mental health concerns, cannot always access their patients' mental health records. This creates a major barrier to integrated care.
The lack of data sharing between physical and mental health services isn’t just an inconvenience—it’s holding back better outcomes for patients, driving up healthcare costs, and slowing the pace of research. Addressing this gap could unlock enormous potential on multiple levels from individual health benefits to national healthcare efficiency and research innovation.
The Impact of Fragmented Data on Individual Health
When mental health data isn’t accessible across the healthcare system, patients are the ones who suffer the most. Physical and mental health are deeply connected, but if doctors don’t have access to a full medical history—including mental health treatments—they may miss critical information. This could lead to misdiagnoses, ineffective treatments, or delays in necessary care.
Imagine a patient suffering from chronic pain and anxiety. The patient’s primary care doctor prescribes medication for pain but doesn’t know about a history of depression that would have been relevant in deciding which medication is appropriate. Similarly, a mental health specialist might treat the anxiety without knowing that it’s exacerbated by an undiagnosed physical condition. Without the ability to collaborate through shared data, doctors end up working in silos, leaving patients to juggle multiple providers on their own.
Collaborative care becomes nearly impossible when data isn’t shared. Integrated treatment plans—such as combining therapy with medication or adjusting physical health care based on mental health needs—rely on healthcare professionals having access to the full picture of the patient’s condition. Better data sharing could enable timely interventions that prevent issues from escalating, ultimately improving outcomes for individuals.
National-Level Benefits of Data Sharing in Mental Health
At a national level, fragmented mental health records create inefficiencies that impact the entire healthcare system. Without shared data, tests are sometimes repeated unnecessarily, treatments overlap, and patients get shuffled from one provider to another. This duplication not only burdens patients but also wastes valuable healthcare resources, such as staff time and hospital beds.
Data sharing can also improve resource allocation. If mental health data is centralized, it becomes easier to track which regions or communities have the highest demand for services. For example, if data reveals a rise in suicide ideation among youth in a particular area, healthcare providers can intervene early by allocating more therapists or opening crisis centers.
As Prof. Eyal Fruchter, Co-Founder and Director of Scientific and Medical Affairs at ICAR-Collective and Chairman of the National Council for Trauma at the Ministry of Health, explains:
“We have three limiting factors to take care of patients: data, resources, and professionals. And without data, we don’t know where we need to add resources and professionals, and we are just guessing.”
This highlights how essential data is—not only for treatment but also for improving the healthcare system’s ability to respond to needs effectively.
Public health surveillance also benefits from better data sharing. Timely access to mental health trends—such as a rise in eating disorders or post-traumatic stress symptoms—enables the government to respond quickly to emerging crises. This kind of data-driven policymaking ensures that limited resources are directed where they are needed most.
Enabling Innovation Through Data Sharing
Beyond healthcare delivery, data sharing opens the door to research and innovation. Mental health research thrives on access to large, anonymized datasets that allow researchers to identify patterns and test new treatments. For example, data could be used to study how different medications or therapies impact people based on their genetic makeup or clinical profile. This kind of research paves the way for personalized mental health care, where treatments are tailored to each patient’s specific needs.
Israel is known for its innovation in healthcare technology, and mental health should be no exception. If mental health data becomes more accessible, the country could become a leader in developing solutions for some of the world’s most pressing mental health challenges. In addition, better data access allows researchers to design interventions that address national issues, such as trauma and stress related to ongoing security concerns.
The Road Ahead: What Will It Take?
Building an efficient system for data sharing in mental health care won’t happen overnight. It will require a comprehensive approach, involving technical, legal, and organizational changes. First, standardized protocols for data exchange need to be developed. Different healthcare providers—from hospitals to mental health clinics—need to be able to share information smoothly and securely.
New data governance policies must also be put in place. Privacy is a significant concern when it comes to mental health records, and patients need to feel confident that their sensitive information will be handled responsibly. Policymakers will need to strike a careful balance between privacy protections and the need for data access to improve care.
Upgrading technological infrastructure is another key step. Many mental health providers still rely on outdated systems that aren’t compatible with newer technologies. Investments will be needed to modernize these systems and integrate them with the broader healthcare network. Experts estimate that it could take four to five years before the full benefits of data sharing become visible, but every step forward brings us closer to a more connected and effective healthcare system.
Conclusion: Moving Toward a Holistic Healthcare System
The time has come for Israel to bridge the gap between physical and mental health care. Patients deserve a system where their mental and physical health needs are treated with equal importance—and that starts with making sure all providers have access to the information they need.
Data sharing isn’t just about making things more efficient; it’s about providing better care for individuals, reducing unnecessary costs, and fostering research and innovation. Whether it’s preventing a crisis through early intervention, improving resource allocation, or designing personalized treatments, the potential benefits of integrated data are enormous.
The road ahead may be challenging, but the payoff will be worth it. By investing in data-sharing solutions today, Israel can build a healthcare system that truly supports the well-being of its people—both in body and mind.
Comments